<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ditching the Diaspora</title>
	<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/</link>
	<description>It's a group blog. What more do you need to know?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-70209</link>
		<author>Mick</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-70209</guid>
		<description>Back to this two years later and still an issue. My partners neice at University in Glasgow is unable to cast a vote in the upcoming local elections (unless she's willing to travel back).

I think if you look at this from a political perspective, Irish emigrants tend to leave when times are tough and the government of the day, (most likely to be FF), are then often associated with the reason for leaving in the first place. Why would a government give the right to vote to those who might vote against them - especially when they have no powerful way to influence them from afar.

On the other hand, If Ireland truly wants to engage with its diaspora this has to be a two-way street. Acknowledge the diaspora's sense of identity, take action to formalise that acknowledgement, and move forward from there. Mutual benefit comes from mutual trust.

Maybe when International RTE does take to the airwaves there will be a good argument for bringing this one back to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to this two years later and still an issue. My partners neice at University in Glasgow is unable to cast a vote in the upcoming local elections (unless she&#8217;s willing to travel back).</p>
<p>I think if you look at this from a political perspective, Irish emigrants tend to leave when times are tough and the government of the day, (most likely to be FF), are then often associated with the reason for leaving in the first place. Why would a government give the right to vote to those who might vote against them - especially when they have no powerful way to influence them from afar.</p>
<p>On the other hand, If Ireland truly wants to engage with its diaspora this has to be a two-way street. Acknowledge the diaspora&#8217;s sense of identity, take action to formalise that acknowledgement, and move forward from there. Mutual benefit comes from mutual trust.</p>
<p>Maybe when International RTE does take to the airwaves there will be a good argument for bringing this one back to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donagh</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-45297</link>
		<author>Donagh</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-45297</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The real problem here is that it’s not just France and the US that allow their expats to vote - it’s that everyone else does as well. There are nearly 100 countries that allow emigrants the right to vote. It’s something the rest of the world takes for granted - Ireland’s policy is really unusual, and becoming more so.&lt;/i&gt;

The case of the recent Polish elections proved this, I think. There was lots of coverage asking how the Polish diaspora in Ireland would vote. It seemed absurd that we were talking about how the Polish would vote while resident in Ireland, while the Irish abroad don’t have the same option, yet it was never picked up on, that I could see anyway. 

&lt;i&gt;I don’t think the issue of whether non-citizen immigrants should be allowed to vote is in competition with the idea of emigrant voting rights (although Ireland’s stance on this is much less unusual!). Voting rights for non-citizen immigrants are also becoming more common internationally - although there aren’t half as many countries allowing this.&lt;/i&gt;

It’s interesting too about how immigrants tend to vote in their host country, once they are eligable. I read a very interesting article recently which pointed out how immigrant communities in Germany and France have a tendency to vote for parties on the Left, because generally it is these parties who are willing to advocate for them. Because this is well known internationally, you’d imagine that the Irish Labour Party, for example, would start lobbying to have voting rights extended to immigrant communities. However, immigrants are eligable to vote in the local elections, and because they’ve a tendency to be based in certain areas around the country such as &lt;a href="http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/opinion/2007/1006/1191439559769.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;North and West Dublin&lt;/a&gt; there’s every reason to assume that they will become a significant voting block. Now of course that could mean that in two years time we could see a number of independent Polish and Lithuanian councillors, but its interesting, although I’m going completely off the point. 

&lt;i&gt;It’s simply a recognition of the way globalisation and increased migration are changing our ideas of political representation.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes. Maybe I wasn’t going off the point after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The real problem here is that it’s not just France and the US that allow their expats to vote - it’s that everyone else does as well. There are nearly 100 countries that allow emigrants the right to vote. It’s something the rest of the world takes for granted - Ireland’s policy is really unusual, and becoming more so.</i></p>
<p>The case of the recent Polish elections proved this, I think. There was lots of coverage asking how the Polish diaspora in Ireland would vote. It seemed absurd that we were talking about how the Polish would vote while resident in Ireland, while the Irish abroad don’t have the same option, yet it was never picked up on, that I could see anyway. </p>
<p><i>I don’t think the issue of whether non-citizen immigrants should be allowed to vote is in competition with the idea of emigrant voting rights (although Ireland’s stance on this is much less unusual!). Voting rights for non-citizen immigrants are also becoming more common internationally - although there aren’t half as many countries allowing this.</i></p>
<p>It’s interesting too about how immigrants tend to vote in their host country, once they are eligable. I read a very interesting article recently which pointed out how immigrant communities in Germany and France have a tendency to vote for parties on the Left, because generally it is these parties who are willing to advocate for them. Because this is well known internationally, you’d imagine that the Irish Labour Party, for example, would start lobbying to have voting rights extended to immigrant communities. However, immigrants are eligable to vote in the local elections, and because they’ve a tendency to be based in certain areas around the country such as <a href="http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/opinion/2007/1006/1191439559769.html" rel="nofollow">North and West Dublin</a> there’s every reason to assume that they will become a significant voting block. Now of course that could mean that in two years time we could see a number of independent Polish and Lithuanian councillors, but its interesting, although I’m going completely off the point. </p>
<p><i>It’s simply a recognition of the way globalisation and increased migration are changing our ideas of political representation.</i></p>
<p>Yes. Maybe I wasn’t going off the point after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noreen</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-45272</link>
		<author>Noreen</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-45272</guid>
		<description>The real problem here is that it's not just France and the US that allow their expats to vote - it's that everyone else does as well. There are nearly 100 countries that allow emigrants the right to vote. It's something the rest of the world takes for granted - Ireland's policy is really unusual, and becoming more so.

I don't think the issue of whether non-citizen immigrants should be allowed to vote is in competition with the idea of emigrant voting rights (although Ireland's stance on this is much less unusual!). Voting rights for non-citizen immigrants are also becoming more common internationally - although there aren't half as many countries allowing this. 

It's simply a recognition of the way globalisation and increased migration are changing our ideas of political representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem here is that it&#8217;s not just France and the US that allow their expats to vote - it&#8217;s that everyone else does as well. There are nearly 100 countries that allow emigrants the right to vote. It&#8217;s something the rest of the world takes for granted - Ireland&#8217;s policy is really unusual, and becoming more so.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the issue of whether non-citizen immigrants should be allowed to vote is in competition with the idea of emigrant voting rights (although Ireland&#8217;s stance on this is much less unusual!). Voting rights for non-citizen immigrants are also becoming more common internationally - although there aren&#8217;t half as many countries allowing this. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s simply a recognition of the way globalisation and increased migration are changing our ideas of political representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donagh</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14990</link>
		<author>Donagh</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 11:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14990</guid>
		<description>Thanks SeÃ¡n. From the comments on Irish Election I think that many of those who have left feel the same way, that ex-pats have no direct involvement in the country and receive no benefits or penalties for voting, therefore there is no need for them to vote. 

I think though that a small measure of voting rights can be allowed for those who happen to be out of the country for a year or two, considering that a government could well last 5 years, although prior to the last decade that was rarely the case. 

However, the main thing seems to be the unwillingness to extend the vote to those from new EU countries who have come into the country. I have seen no debate about this at all, so it was worth bringing it up here and on IE for that reason alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks SeÃ¡n. From the comments on Irish Election I think that many of those who have left feel the same way, that ex-pats have no direct involvement in the country and receive no benefits or penalties for voting, therefore there is no need for them to vote. </p>
<p>I think though that a small measure of voting rights can be allowed for those who happen to be out of the country for a year or two, considering that a government could well last 5 years, although prior to the last decade that was rarely the case. </p>
<p>However, the main thing seems to be the unwillingness to extend the vote to those from new EU countries who have come into the country. I have seen no debate about this at all, so it was worth bringing it up here and on IE for that reason alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeÃ¡n BÃ¡ite</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14534</link>
		<author>SeÃ¡n BÃ¡ite</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 09:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14534</guid>
		<description>Am concerned by the issue, but must say I am a bit bemused when the French innocently ask me 'don't the Irish abroad vote in your elections?' They're again taking it for granted that every country in the world has the luxury to be French. I had always assumed we didn't get to vote because of our being a nation (until recently) of mass EMigration and that the electorate abroad would be disproportionately large. I would also assume that the best people to vote in a country's election would be those actually making a contribution to the country (through tax/labour for ex. - the former excluding half of the Soldiers of Destiny's front bench, obviously). Those Poles currently there, again, should have more of a say than the likes of me that shagged off out of the place. 
Next time the French condescend towards you about voting rights in Ireland, ask them about the hundreds of thousands of Maghrebins they brought in to serve as cheap labour during their 'trentaines glorieuses' that have never had the right to vote in anything since...
PS Good article all the same Seanachie - and follow-up from Donagh likewise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am concerned by the issue, but must say I am a bit bemused when the French innocently ask me &#8216;don&#8217;t the Irish abroad vote in your elections?&#8217; They&#8217;re again taking it for granted that every country in the world has the luxury to be French. I had always assumed we didn&#8217;t get to vote because of our being a nation (until recently) of mass EMigration and that the electorate abroad would be disproportionately large. I would also assume that the best people to vote in a country&#8217;s election would be those actually making a contribution to the country (through tax/labour for ex. - the former excluding half of the Soldiers of Destiny&#8217;s front bench, obviously). Those Poles currently there, again, should have more of a say than the likes of me that shagged off out of the place.<br />
Next time the French condescend towards you about voting rights in Ireland, ask them about the hundreds of thousands of Maghrebins they brought in to serve as cheap labour during their &#8216;trentaines glorieuses&#8217; that have never had the right to vote in anything since&#8230;<br />
PS Good article all the same Seanachie - and follow-up from Donagh likewise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donagh</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14127</link>
		<author>Donagh</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14127</guid>
		<description>Thanks people. I appreciate that. I'm sure there are historical reasons why countries like France allow the ex-pat vote. Perhaps its a legacy of colonial times, where the administrators and settlers in the new land would definitely have an interest in who was ultimately controlling their destiny, but colonialism wained as democracy triumphed, so perhaps that's not the reason why France et al maintain the ex-pat vote. I suspect the reason for the US long distance vote is to facilitate US employees working in Corporations that have gone truely global. 

There seems to be a reaction against this from some ex-pats, judging from the comments on &lt;a href="http://www.irishelection.com/04/ditching-the-diaspora/" rel="nofollow"&gt;IE&lt;/a&gt;. They're saying that those who have left the old sod behind shouldn't be allowed to control things in their absense, especially as they don't pay taxes or gain the benefits/misfortunes of living here. 

But the way of the modern world is very different now, as you own experience Seanachie, testifies. What about the people who are working abroad for relatively short periods of time (one or two years), or make regular trips back to Ireland. Anyone living on the continent probably comes back twice a year.  What about those working in Saudi Arabia or The United Arab Emirates. They're not going to live there forever. There should be some mechanism to provide for this. 

The main issue in this though seems to be, as you mention again Seanachie, that the majority of non-nationals aren't eligable to vote for a goodly long time. Considering that they pay tax and the Government controls all the public service upon which they rely they should be allowed to have a say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks people. I appreciate that. I&#8217;m sure there are historical reasons why countries like France allow the ex-pat vote. Perhaps its a legacy of colonial times, where the administrators and settlers in the new land would definitely have an interest in who was ultimately controlling their destiny, but colonialism wained as democracy triumphed, so perhaps that&#8217;s not the reason why France et al maintain the ex-pat vote. I suspect the reason for the US long distance vote is to facilitate US employees working in Corporations that have gone truely global. </p>
<p>There seems to be a reaction against this from some ex-pats, judging from the comments on <a href="http://www.irishelection.com/04/ditching-the-diaspora/" rel="nofollow">IE</a>. They&#8217;re saying that those who have left the old sod behind shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to control things in their absense, especially as they don&#8217;t pay taxes or gain the benefits/misfortunes of living here. </p>
<p>But the way of the modern world is very different now, as you own experience Seanachie, testifies. What about the people who are working abroad for relatively short periods of time (one or two years), or make regular trips back to Ireland. Anyone living on the continent probably comes back twice a year.  What about those working in Saudi Arabia or The United Arab Emirates. They&#8217;re not going to live there forever. There should be some mechanism to provide for this. </p>
<p>The main issue in this though seems to be, as you mention again Seanachie, that the majority of non-nationals aren&#8217;t eligable to vote for a goodly long time. Considering that they pay tax and the Government controls all the public service upon which they rely they should be allowed to have a say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14046</link>
		<author>Ben</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14046</guid>
		<description>Great article. It will be interesting to see if the Irish Times - or indeed anyone else in the mainstream - picks up on the expat vote issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. It will be interesting to see if the Irish Times - or indeed anyone else in the mainstream - picks up on the expat vote issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seanachie</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14042</link>
		<author>Seanachie</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14042</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, and far more thorough than my own. I can understand that voting in an Irish election will cease to have pertinence after a certain period of time for many long-term expats but as long as they cannot vote in their adopted countries, the &lt;i&gt;right&lt;/i&gt; to vote should be still made available. France and the US allow their citizens to vote for decades after they have emigrated. Facilitating emigrants who have been gone a much shorter time should be incumbent on the Irish legislature; and while we're at it non-nationals (or at least those from other EU states) should also be allowed to vote if they have lived, say, five years in Ireland. If the Poles or the Romanians feel inclined to vote Fianna FÃ¡il, so be it, they do, &lt;i&gt;pace&lt;/i&gt; Dev, have the right to do wrong. Mise le meas, as the doorstepping leaflets say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, and far more thorough than my own. I can understand that voting in an Irish election will cease to have pertinence after a certain period of time for many long-term expats but as long as they cannot vote in their adopted countries, the <i>right</i> to vote should be still made available. France and the US allow their citizens to vote for decades after they have emigrated. Facilitating emigrants who have been gone a much shorter time should be incumbent on the Irish legislature; and while we&#8217;re at it non-nationals (or at least those from other EU states) should also be allowed to vote if they have lived, say, five years in Ireland. If the Poles or the Romanians feel inclined to vote Fianna FÃ¡il, so be it, they do, <i>pace</i> Dev, have the right to do wrong. Mise le meas, as the doorstepping leaflets say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepillionpassenger</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14041</link>
		<author>thepillionpassenger</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2007/04/30/ditching-the-diaspora/#comment-14041</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't have any problem with Irish people living abroad sending home a vote. This 'out of touch with the issues' thing is plainly anti-democratic. Who has the right to tell anybody what 'issues' are? The issues are what you think they are - whether it be that collapsed wall at the end of your street or US troops in Shannon.  

Even if we accept it as a valid argument, it immediately collapses under the weight of media available to people living anywhere in the developed world. 

The French were queuing past dinner time outside their Dublin embassy.  They embarrass us. Not by the speed of which they count their votes, but by the openess, participation and variety of their politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have any problem with Irish people living abroad sending home a vote. This &#8216;out of touch with the issues&#8217; thing is plainly anti-democratic. Who has the right to tell anybody what &#8216;issues&#8217; are? The issues are what you think they are - whether it be that collapsed wall at the end of your street or US troops in Shannon.  </p>
<p>Even if we accept it as a valid argument, it immediately collapses under the weight of media available to people living anywhere in the developed world. </p>
<p>The French were queuing past dinner time outside their Dublin embassy.  They embarrass us. Not by the speed of which they count their votes, but by the openess, participation and variety of their politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

